- #MENUMETERS MAC DISPLAYS INCORRECT PROCESSOR NUMBER HOW TO#
- #MENUMETERS MAC DISPLAYS INCORRECT PROCESSOR NUMBER SERIAL NUMBERS#
- #MENUMETERS MAC DISPLAYS INCORRECT PROCESSOR NUMBER SERIAL NUMBER#
- #MENUMETERS MAC DISPLAYS INCORRECT PROCESSOR NUMBER UPGRADE#
From this MBP I then exported the guest to the 2019 iMac. It currently still reflects the correct 4 CPUs.
I exported this guest from it to a 2015 MBP (with a Core i5-5287U 2c/4t processor) after upgrading to Catalina and disabling a crippling feature - which I cannot now remember what it was called. How can this be fixed? I currently have it set to 4, but anything from 2-5 is easily usable.Ī little history: I first created this VM on a early 2013 Macbook Pro 15" using Mojave (with the Core i7-4850HQ 4c/8t processor) and these settings reflected the correct 8 available CPUs. Sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use.When I open settings for my Win10 guest (2019 iMac with 3Ghz Core i5-8500 6c/6t processor) it offers me up to 12 cores. To ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the Which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient Although thisĮmail message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to beįree of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into Message or any or all of the information contained therein. Of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email Recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies Review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the informationĬontained therein is strictly prohibited. Received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution, If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise Information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the
#MENUMETERS MAC DISPLAYS INCORRECT PROCESSOR NUMBER SERIAL NUMBER#
It would be good problem for the mainframe community to have more thanĦ4K physical mainframes of any given type running in the worldįWIW, we check only the last four hex digits of the serial number in our
#MENUMETERS MAC DISPLAYS INCORRECT PROCESSOR NUMBER UPGRADE#
*routinely* upgrade from one CPU type to another *without* changing the
#MENUMETERS MAC DISPLAYS INCORRECT PROCESSOR NUMBER SERIAL NUMBERS#
Serial numbers are so sparse that we see customers I've always assumed they are not *guaranteed* unique, but in practice > Now, an interesting (to me) question is whether the 4-character version is
#MENUMETERS MAC DISPLAYS INCORRECT PROCESSOR NUMBER HOW TO#
Again, the product will not work at all until we play the vendor's key game.Īdvice to vendors: if you force your customer to manage without your product for some time, you run the risk of demonstrating how to manage without it forever.Ħ2 Office ⇐= 12:19 AM, Martin Packer wrote:
(This one has no grace period.) Furthermore, on our DR box, most LPARs do not run at all except during DR tests. At that point the product in question will not run at all. For a typical push-pull installation, we can't even IPL all (or often any) LPARs on a new box until Big Bang day when everything has to work ASAP. I can't tell you how supremely irritating this is. One particular vendor demands to see the results of 'D M=CPU' for *every individual LPAR* on a box. It's SOP for vendors who issue CPU-based keys to require notification of upcoming hardware changes in order to generate new keys. Please kick that 'well seasoned' z/OS systems programmer where the sun is not shining and show him the door. match with this from D M=CPU, where I see this:ĬPC ND = 00?.?.IBM.84.0000000? (That is where your A58C7 sit) A58C7įrom my Sub-Capacity Report, I always compare that these 2 lines That number is not near that number you posted. You said: "Additionally, VTAM-Print says: (GSMINITL) THIS CPU: 758C7" In fact, always ensure what your vendor (and your 'seasoned' programmer) has, is EXACTLY the same what you read.īut never mind, I totally ignored that part of VTAM-Print, because I am 101% unfamiliar with that thing. It escalated before I had a chance to even think about the LPAR id.ĭid I told you that he is insulting you in a royal way? He just looked at the vendor's email (which included the real CPUID), looked at the D M=CPU and started an email war. >The thing is, he did not even try the new key before he started the fussing.
0 kommentar(er)
